By sharing these experiences of mine, along with how I’ve
interpreted and integrated them into the rest of my belief structures,
I feel like I’ve at least fulfilled my basic duty as a conscientious
citizen of this orb on which we humans find ourselves.
What will come of this effort?
Quite
possibly nothing at all. If it has any effect, the most
likely
one seems to be spurring some other people with experiences similar to
mine to share theirs, too. If enough people do this, maybe
better-credentialed people might also consider it worth their while to
begin some preliminary sniffing around in the area.
Also, from
what I’ve heard and read, the modern-day Catholic Church has a special
investigations team for vetting possible saints, which subjects potential
miracles to some pretty rigorous screening, and proclaims to them to be
actual miracles only when there’s no other explanation for their
occurrence. If these folks could expand their scope just a bit to
include the sorts of experiences I’ve described here, who knows what
they might be able to document?
I may not
be the best person to propose this to them, though. For one
thing, they might consider me a just wee bit impudent for suggesting
that people at the
communion rail ought to start saying “Pass the crackers.” And
somehow I doubt they'd give me an enthusiastic two-thumbs up for
my descriptions of how I believe they let a super-salesman named Saul
of
Tarsus, and later, a Roman emperor, lead them down some unproductive
paths r.
—Oh, and maybe I’d better consider removing the
story of how my Cotta ancestors helped Martin Luther thumb his nose at
them and the whole stodgy, sometimes hypocritical administrative
superstructure they later drifted into.
But who
knows? Maybe the work St. Erlembaldo did nearly a thousand
years
ago to help them revitalize their organization and get back to their
ideals will persuade them to take a more tolerant view of the bratty
insolence of one distant member of his family (me).
A potential
outcome of all this might be that some radically broad-minded scientist
somewhere would also become curious. Who knows what this
person’s
explorations might involve? Could they incorporate the
“mirror
neurons” that the neuroscientist V.S. Ramachandran has spoken of as a
possible physiological basis for human empathy—as well as a lot of
Eastern mysticism?
Or could such an effort result in the
positing of a hypothetical additional form of “soul energy”—with a
dimension of sentience, which is missing in the other forms of energy
we know about, like simple electricity?
Could this form
of energy be especially transmittable within networks of kinship? And
could it also be found to be especially capable of
transcending time—and thereby carrying a soul’s memories, knowledge,
and insights forward into a contemporary moment when they’re needed to
help someone?
Well, stranger things have happened. I once
dated a girl whose father was a NASA engineer. She
told me
her dad used to sit around watching Star Trek with his
engineer buddies, and they’d get ideas from the TV show for things they
might actually be able to build.
Still, these questions are so far above my pay grade that I won’t even
attempt to address them.
What
I’m reasonably confident of is that I’ve now done my duty, by sharing
the unusual experiences I’ve been privileged to have. This
enables me to feel free to go back to stirring up trouble in other
areas of contemporary life where I’m also without formal credentials,
and oddly enough, nobody can recall having invited me into the discussion.
Hey,
it seems to be what I’m meant to do! And I believe that’s the
most solid foundation anyone can have for a satisfying life.